Rural Education in Malawi

Lillian Ziyenda Katenga-Kaunda, Penjani Rhoda Kamudoni, Gerd Holmboe-Ottesen, Heidi E Fjeld, Ibrahimu Mdala, Zumin Shi, Per Ole Iversen

Abstract

In many sub-Saharan African countries, such as Malawi, antenatal care (ANC) services do not deliver sufficient nutrition awareness to improve adequate dietary intake in pregnancy. We therefore compared the effects of supplementary nutrition education and dietary counselling with routine ANC service on nutrition knowledge and dietary intakes among Malawian pregnant women.

Methods

We used data from a two-armed cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) of which the intervention group received supplementary nutrition education, dietary counselling and routine ANC services whereas the controls received only routine ANC services. The RCT was conducted in 10 control and 10 intervention villages in Mangochi, Southern Malawi and included pregnant women between their 9th and 16th gestational weeks. We examined the changes in nutrition knowledge and dietary diversity from enrolment (baseline) to study end-point of the RCT (two weeks before expected delivery). We used three linear multilevel regression models with random effects at village level (cluster) to examine the associations between indicators of nutrition knowledge and diet consumption adjusted for selected explanatory variables.

Results

Among 257 pregnant women enrolled to the RCT, 195 (76%) were available for the current study. The supplementary nutrition education and counselling led to significant improvements in nutrition knowledge, dietary diversity and nutrition behaviour in the intervention group compared with controls. Most women from both study groups had a moderate consumption of diversified foods at study end-point. A significant positive association between nutrition knowledge and consumption of a diversified diet was only observed in the intervention group.

Conclusions

Nutrition knowledge and dietary diversity improved in both study groups, but higher in the intervention group. Increased nutrition knowledge was associated with improved dietary diversity only in the intervention women, who also improved their nutrition perceptions and behaviour. Antenatal nutrition education needs strengthening to improve dietary intakes in pregnancy in this low resource-setting.

Introduction

Malawi, like many other sub-Saharan African countries, faces challenges in delivering sufficient nutrition education to pregnant women during antenatal care (ANC) services. Adequate nutrition knowledge and dietary intake are essential for the health and well-being of pregnant women and their unborn babies [1]. However, studies have shown that pregnant women in Malawi have limited nutrition knowledge and often have poor dietary diversity [2]. ANC services present an opportunity to provide education and counselling on nutrition, but studies have shown that the quality and content of nutrition education during ANC visits in many low-resource settings, including Malawi, is inadequate [3].

Poor nutrition during pregnancy can lead to adverse outcomes such as low birth weight, stunting, and micronutrient deficiencies [4]. Therefore, it is crucial to improve nutrition knowledge and dietary intakes among pregnant women in Malawi. Supplementary nutrition education and dietary counselling have been shown to be effective in improving nutrition knowledge and dietary practices in various settings [5, 6]. By comparing the effects of these interventions with routine ANC services, we can determine the most effective approach for improving nutrition knowledge and dietary intakes among pregnant women in rural Malawi.

In this study, we conducted a two-armed cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) to assess the impact of supplementary nutrition education and dietary counselling on nutrition knowledge and dietary diversity among pregnant women in Mangochi, Southern Malawi. We compared the outcomes of the intervention group, which received nutrition education and counselling in addition to routine ANC services, with the control group, which received only routine ANC services. The aim of this study was to determine whether the supplementary intervention led to improvements in nutrition knowledge and dietary diversity among pregnant women in a low-resource setting.

Methods

Study Design

The study was a two-armed cluster randomised controlled trial conducted in Mangochi, Southern Malawi. The intervention group received supplementary nutrition education, dietary counselling, and routine ANC services, while the control group received only routine ANC services. The study included pregnant women between their 9th and 16th gestational weeks.

Study Setting

The study was conducted in 10 control and 10 intervention villages in Mangochi, which is located in the southern region of Malawi. Mangochi is a rural district with limited access to healthcare services, including ANC. The majority of the population relies on subsistence farming for their livelihood. Malnutrition, including undernutrition and micronutrient deficiencies, is a significant public health issue in the area.

Participants

A total of 257 pregnant women were enrolled in the RCT, with 195 (76%) available for the current study. The women were recruited from the 20 study villages in Mangochi. Inclusion criteria for the study included being in the 9th to 16th week of gestation and residing in one of the study villages. Women with multiple pregnancies, severe medical conditions, or complications that required immediate medical attention were excluded from the study.

Procedures

The study participants were randomly assigned to either the control or intervention group. Women in the intervention group received supplementary nutrition education and dietary counselling in addition to routine ANC services. The nutrition education sessions were conducted by trained health workers and covered topics such as the importance of a balanced diet, the benefits of consuming a variety of foods, and the role of specific nutrients during pregnancy.

The dietary counselling sessions focused on practical aspects of improving dietary diversity, such as using locally available foods, preparing balanced meals, and addressing cultural practices that may limit food choices. The counselling sessions were individualized to address the specific needs and preferences of each participant.

Data on nutrition knowledge and dietary diversity were collected at baseline and at the end-point of the RCT, which was two weeks before the expected delivery date. Nutrition knowledge was assessed using a validated questionnaire [7], and dietary diversity was measured using the Diet Diversity Score (DDS) [8, 9]. The DDS is a simple tool that assesses the consumption of different food groups over a specified period. A higher DDS indicates a greater variety of foods consumed.

Data Analysis

The data were analyzed using three linear multilevel regression models with random effects at the village level (cluster). The models examined the associations between indicators of nutrition knowledge and dietary consumption, adjusted for selected explanatory variables. The changes in nutrition knowledge and dietary diversity from baseline to the end-point of the RCT were also analyzed.

Results

Of the 257 pregnant women enrolled in the RCT, 195 (76%) were included in the analysis for the current study. The supplementary nutrition education and counselling led to significant improvements in nutrition knowledge, dietary diversity, and nutrition behavior in the intervention group compared to the control group. At the end-point of the RCT, most women in both study groups had a moderate consumption of diversified foods. However, a significant positive association between nutrition knowledge and consumption of a diversified diet was only observed in the intervention group.

Discussion

The results of this study indicate that supplementary nutrition education and dietary counselling can lead to improvements in nutrition knowledge and dietary diversity among pregnant women in rural Malawi. The intervention group, which received the additional education and counselling, showed greater improvements compared to the control group. This suggests that antenatal nutrition education needs to be strengthened in order to improve dietary intakes in pregnancy in this low-resource setting.

Strengths and Limitations

One of the strengths of this study is the use of a cluster randomised controlled trial design, which allowed for the comparison of the effects of the intervention with routine ANC services. The study also used validated tools to assess nutrition knowledge and dietary diversity. However, there are several limitations to consider. First, the study was conducted in a specific geographic area of Malawi, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to other regions. Second, the study relied on self-reported data, which may be subject to recall bias. Finally, the study did not assess the long-term effects of the intervention on maternal and child health outcomes.

Implications for Practice

The findings of this study highlight the importance of strengthening nutrition education and counselling during ANC visits in rural Malawi. By providing pregnant women with the knowledge and skills to improve their dietary diversity, healthcare providers can contribute to better maternal and child health outcomes. The study also emphasizes the need for culturally sensitive approaches that take into account local food practices and preferences.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study demonstrates that supplementary nutrition education and dietary counselling can lead to improvements in nutrition knowledge and dietary diversity among pregnant women in rural Malawi. The intervention group, which received the additional education and counselling, showed greater improvements compared to the control group. These findings have important implications for antenatal care in low-resource settings, where nutrition education is often inadequate. Strengthening nutrition education during ANC visits can contribute to improved dietary intakes in pregnancy and better maternal and child health outcomes.

Keywords: Diet; Education; Foods; Pregnancy.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1 Map of Malawi showing Mangochi District (red), Lake Malawi blue), and Location of T.A. Nankumba (right side inset) with the study villages (intervention-green and control-white circles). Modified from source [21] Fig. 2 Flow chart showing the enrolment of participants into the two study groups Fig. 3 Association between nutrition knowledge and dietary diversity score. The values represent marginal means with 95% confidence intervals, and adjusted for age, education and household size Fig. 4 Mean changes in nutrition knowledge and diet diversity score within and between the two study groups. Values are mean (95% confidence intervals) changes in nutrition knowledge and DDS. Estimates to the right of the vertical line (dotted) in the forest plot represents increases in scores whereas estimates to the left represent decreases of the scores. The 95% confidence intervals cutting through the vertical line represents results that are not statistically significant. CI, confidence interval; DDS, diet diversity score

References

  1. Villar J, Ba’aqeel H, Piaggio G, Lumbiganon P, Miguel Belizan J, Farnot U, et al. WHO antenatal care randomised trial for the evaluation of a new model of routine antenatal care. Lancet. 2001;357:1551–1564. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04722-X.

  2. Walters C, Bendulo P, Stoecker BJ. Assessment of dietary diversity antenatal care, food taboos, meal frequency and nutrition status of pregnant adolescents in rural Malawi: a cross-sectional study. Afr J Food Agric Nutr Dev. 2019;19:14555.

  3. Tuncalp, Pena-Rosas JP, Lawrie T, Bucagu M, Oladapo OT, Portela A, et al. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience-going beyond survival. BJOG. 2017;124:860–862. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14599.

  4. Ngwira A, Stanley CC. Determinants of low birth weight in Malawi: Bayesian geo-additive modelling. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0130057. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130057.

  5. Contento IR. Nutrition education: linking research, theory, and practice. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2008;17(Suppl 1):176–179.

  6. Zoellner J, Connell C, Bounds W, Crook L, Yadrick K. Peer reviewed: Nutrition literacy status and preferred nutrition communication channels among adults in the lower Mississippi Delta. Prev Chronic Dis. 2009;6:A128.

  7. Spronk I, Kullen C, Burdon C, O’Connor H. Relationship between nutrition knowledge and dietary intake. Brit J Nutr. 2014;111:1713–1726. doi: 10.1017/S0007114514000087.

  8. National Guidelines on Nutrition Care, Support, and Treatment (NCST) for adolescents and adults 2nd edition. Malawian Ministry of Health Health. . Accessed 23 Jan 2021.

  9. Dietary diversity as a measure of the micronutrient adequacy of women’s diets in resource-poor areas: summary of results from five sites. FANTA-2. . Accessed 23 Jan 2021.

  10. Guidelines for measuring household and individual dietary diversity. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome, 2016.

  11. Perumal N, Cole DC, Ouédraogo HZ, Sindi K, Loechl C, Low J, et al. Health and nutrition knowledge, attitudes and practices of pregnant women attending and not-attending ANC clinics in Western Kenya: a cross-sectional analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:146. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-146.

  12. Arrish J, Yeatman H, Williamson M. Midwives and nutrition education during pregnancy: a literature review. Women Birth. 2014;27:2–8. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2013.02.003.

  13. Anya SE, Hydara A, Jaiteh LE. Antenatal care in The Gambia: Missed opportunity for information, education and communication. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2008;8:9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-8-9.

  14. Miltenburg AS, van der Eem L, Nyanza EC, van Pelt S, Ndaki P, Basinda N, et al. Antenatal care and opportunities for quality improvement of service provision in resource limited settings: a mixed methods study. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0188279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188279.

  15. von Both C, Flessa S, Makuwani A, Mpembeni R, Jahn A. How much time do health services spend on antenatal care? Implications for the introduction of the focused antenatal care model in Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2006;6:22. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-6-22.

  16. Konje ET, Magoma MTN, Hatfield J, Kuhn S, Sauve RS, Dewey DM. Missed opportunities in antenatal care for improving the health of pregnant women and newborns in Geita district, Northwest Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18:394. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2014-8.

  17. Machira K, Palamuleni M. Women’s perspectives on quality of maternal health care services in Malawi. Int J Womens Health. 2018;10:25–34. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S144426.

  18. Magoma M, Requejo J, Merialdi M, Campbell OM, Cousens S, Filippi V. How much time is available for antenatal care consultations? Assessment of the quality of care in rural Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11:64. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-11-64.

  19. Malawi Deomgraphic and Health Study. Malawi 2010: results from the Demographic and Health Study. Stud Fam Plann. 2012;43–147–152.

  20. Ziyenda Katenga-Kaunda L, Iversen PO, Holmboe-Ottesen G, Fjeld H, Mdala I, Kamudoni PR. Dietary intake and processes of behaviour change in a nutrition education intervention for pregnant women in rural Malawi: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Public Health Nutr. 2020;23:2345–2354. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020000294.

  21. Makaula P, Funsanani M, Mamba KC, Musaya J, Bloch P. Strengthening primary health care at district-level in Malawi – determining the coverage, costs and benefits of community-directed interventions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):509.

  22. UNICEF. Strategy for improved nutrition of children and women in developing countries: A UNICEF Policy Review. UNICEF. 1990, E/ICEF/1990/L. 6, New York.

  23. Nutrient Data Laboratory, Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, ARS, USDA. USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Legacy Release. 2019. . Accessed 14 June 2021.

  24. Manary MJ, Krebs NF, Gibson RS, Broadhead RL, Hambidge KM. Community-based dietary phytate reduction and its effect on iron status in Malawian children. Ann Trop Paediatr. 2002;22:133–136. doi: 10.1179/027249302125000850.

  25. Mistry SK, Hossain MB, Arora A. Maternal nutrition counselling is associated with reduced stunting prevalence and improved feeding practices in early childhood: a post-program comparison study. Nutr J. 2019;18:47. doi: 10.1186/s12937-019-0473-z.

  26. Parmenter K, Wardle J. Development of a general nutrition knowledge questionnaire for adults. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1999;53:298–308. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600726.

  27. Fink G, Victora CG, Harttgen K, Vollmer S, Vidaletti LP, Barros AJ. Measuring socioeconomic inequalities with predicted absolute incomes rather than wealth quintiles: a comparative assessment using child stunting data from national surveys. Am J Public Health. 2017;107:550–555. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303657.

  28. Ruel MT, Deitchler M, Arimond M. Developing simple measures of women’s diet quality in developing countries: overview. J Nutr. 2010;140:2048s–2050s. doi: 10.3945/jn.110.123695.

  29. Arimond M. Dietary diversity as a measure of the micronutrient adequacy of women’s diets in resource-poor areas: Summary of results from five sites. In. Edited by FANTA -B. Washington, DC FHI 360;2011.

  30. Kennedy G, Fanou-Fogny N, Seghieri C, Arimond M, Koreissi Y, Dossa R, Kok FJ, Brouwer ID. Food groups associated with a composite measure of probability of adequate intake of 11 micronutrients in the diets of women in urban Mali. J Nutr. 2010;140:2070s–2078s. doi: 10.3945/jn.110.123612.

  31. Martin-Prevel Y, Becquey E, Arimond M, Wiesmann D, Carriquiry A, Daniels M, Deitchler M, Fanou N, Ferguson E, Joseph M. Potential of dietary diversity scores as proxies of micronutrient adequacy of women’s diet in urban Burkina Faso. Ann Nutr Metab. 2009;55:121.

  32. Ashorn P, Alho L, Ashorn U, Cheung YB, Dewey KG, Harjunmaa U, Lartey A, Nkhoma M, Phiri N, Phuka J, Vosti SA, Zeilani M, Maleta K. The impact of lipid-based nutrient supplement provision to pregnant women on newborn size in rural Malawi: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;101:387–397. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.114.088617.

  33. National Statistical Office. Malawi Demographic and Health Survey 2015–16. . Accessed 23 Jan 2021.

  34. Girard AW, Olude O. Nutrition education and counselling provided during pregnancy: effects on maternal, neonatal and child health outcomes. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012;26(Suppl 1):191–204. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2012.01278.x.

  35. Downe S, Finlayson K, Tuncalp O, Gulmezoglu AM. What matters to women: a systematic scoping review to identify the processes and outcomes of antenatal care provision that are important to healthy pregnant women. BJOG. 2016;123:529–539. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13819.

  36. Nikiema B, Beninguisse G, Haggerty JL. Providing information on pregnancy complications during antenatal visits: unmet educational needs in sub-Saharan Africa. Health Policy Plan. 2009;24:367–376. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czp017.

  37. McHenga M, Burger R, von Fintel D. Examining the impact of WHO’s Focused Antenatal Care policy on early access, underutilisation and quality of antenatal care services in Malawi: a retrospective study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19:295. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4130-1.

  38. Nana A, Zema T. Dietary practices and associated factors during pregnancy in northwestern Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18:183. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1822-1.

  39. Zerfu TA, Biadgilign S. Pregnant mothers have limited knowledge and poor dietary diversity practices, but favorable attitude towards nutritional recommendations in rural Ethiopia: evidence from community-based study. BMC Nutr. 2018;4:43. doi: 10.1186/s40795-018-0251-x.

  40. McLeod ER, Campbell KJ, Hesketh KD. Nutrition knowledge: a mediator between socioeconomic position and diet quality in Australian first-time mothers. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111:696–704. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2011.02.011.

  41. Wardle J, Parmenter K, Waller J. Nutrition knowledge and food intake. Appetite. 2000;34:269–275. doi: 10.1006/appe.1999.0311.

  42. Worsley A. Nutrition knowledge and food consumption: can nutrition knowledge change food behaviour? Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2002;11(Suppl 3):S579–585. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-6047.11.supp3.7.x.